Articles Posted in Car Accident

An early morning two-vehicle collision in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood recently claimed the life a 67-year-old woman. According to Chicago Police Officer John Mirabelli, the woman was riding in the backseat of a Volkswagon Golf that was headed south on Pulaski Street around 4:45 am when a northbound Chevrolet Blazer entered the southbound lane. The Blazer reportedly struck the passenger side of the Golf despite that the 25-year-old driver of the Volkswagon swerved in an attempt to avoid a collision.

The Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office said emergency responders transported the 67-year-old woman to Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center where she was pronounced dead about half an hour after the wreck. The driver of the Golf was reportedly taken to the same hospital with unknown injuries. Mirabelli said a 25-year-old man who was riding in the front seat of the Volkswagon refused medical treatment.

The driver of the Blazer allegedly fled the scene of the fatal accident. Mirabelli said the man was later apprehended and interviewed by police. The cause of the wreck is currently being examined by Chicago’s Major Accident Investigation Unit. At this time, no charges have been filed against the driver of the Blazer.

According to the Illinois Department of Transportation, 918 people were killed in Illinois traffic accidents last year. Sadly, the total number of traffic fatalities in our state in 2012 will be even higher. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data shows that fatal accidents like this one are three times more likely to occur when it is dark outside than during the day. In fact, approximately half of all driver and passenger deaths across the nation occur at night despite that only about 25 percent of vehicle miles are driven in the dark. Collisions that involved speeding or alcohol, as well as single-vehicle crashes are also reportedly more likely to take place at night.

The victim in a Chicago car accident may be entitled to receive compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, lost wages and benefits, any resulting disability, and other damages. The family of someone who was killed due to the negligent actions of a motorist may also be eligible to recover for wrongful death. If you were hurt or a loved one was killed in an unexpected crash, a qualified car accident attorney can help.
Continue reading

A 25-year-old Chicago woman was killed and her passenger was hospitalized after she allegedly drove into a number of crash barrels on the Kennedy Expressway near Harlem Avenue. According to Illinois State Police Trooper Chris Asmar, the woman appeared to have unexpectedly lost control of the Honda Accord she was driving while traveling at a high rate of speed in the left lane of the highway. The vehicle reportedly bounced off of a wall of the expressway and came to rest in the opposite shoulder.

Following the collision, emergency responders transported a 24-year-old male passenger to Advocate Lutheran General Hospital in Park Ridge for treatment. In addition, a spokesperson for the Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office said the woman was pronounced dead at Resurrection Medical Center about half an hour after the early morning accident occurred. The exact cause of the fatal crash is currently under investigation. Asmar stated weather does not appear to have played a role in the collision and both people riding in the Honda were wearing a seatbelt at the time of the crash.

Sadly, single-vehicle crashes like this one occur frequently in the Chicago Metro. Malfunctioning automobiles, swerving to avoid a wreck, road hazards, and weather are common causes for such collisions. In addition, a passenger in a vehicle that was driven by a distracted or impaired driver may become the victim of an injury wreck. In 2011, 532 people were killed in single-vehicle accidents in Illinois. That means more than half of the 918 fatal crashes throughout the state involved only one automobile. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the bulk of those crashes occurred in cities like Chicago.

In some cases, a motor vehicle manufacturer, another driver, a city, and others may be held responsible for the injuries that resulted from a one-car accident. If you were hurt through no fault of your own in a single-car crash, you may be entitled to compensation for the cost of your medical care, physical therapy, pain and suffering, disability, lost wages, and more. Because Illinois is a comparative negligence accident state, you may be able to recover damages for any injuries sustained in a single-vehicle collision even if you were partially to blame. If you have questions, you should contact a hardworking car accident lawyer as soon as possible to discuss your options for recovery.
Continue reading

Two people were killed when an unlicensed driver who was suspected of driving a stolen car crashed head-on into another vehicle in the western suburbs of Chicago. A 30-year-old Wisconsin woman allegedly stole a 2003 Nissan Altima and left the scene of a crash after she hit another vehicle in Geneva. The woman then allegedly led a Kane County Sheriff’s Deputy on a high-speed chase down Route 38. After the deputy determined it was unsafe to continue the pursuit, he reportedly stopped attempting to apprehend the woman near Compton Hills. Still, the woman allegedly continued driving the stolen Nissan at speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour. Unfortunately, the woman soon collided head-on with a vehicle that was being driven by an 18-year-old Maple Park man.

The woman driving the Nissan was reportedly pronounced dead at the scene of the accident. Following the crash, the 18-year-old man she struck was taken to Good Samaritan Hospital in Downers Grove by emergency helicopter. Sadly, the man reportedly died as a result of the injuries he sustained in the collision. According to police, the head-on accident also caused another crash which sent two additional drivers to local area hospitals with injuries that were deemed to be non-life threatening.

A head-on collision normally occurs when a driver fails to maintain his or her lane and travels on the wrong side of a roadway. Unfortunately, such collisions generally cause catastrophic or fatal injuries. Head-on accidents are often caused by driver inexperience, impairment, speeding, illegal passing, inattention, and defects in the design of a roadway. According to the Fatal Analysis Reporting System created by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, someone is killed in about 82 percent of all head-on accidents nationwide.

In order to promote the safety of everyone who travels on our roadways, the Illinois Vehicle Code requires all drivers who operate a car, truck or motorcycle to obtain a driver’s license. Regrettably, some drivers choose to ignore this law to the detriment of themselves and others. According to the Illinois Department of Transportation, almost 43 percent of fatal crashes in Illinois in 2011 involved an unlicensed driver. If you were injured or tragically lost a loved one in a Chicago motor vehicle accident, you should discuss your case with a skilled car accident lawyer as soon as you are able.
Continue reading

Illinois legislators are reportedly considering a measure designed to allow an estimated 250,000 illegal immigrants in the state to obtain temporary motor vehicle operator’s licenses. Although the exact details of the proposed measure have not yet been finalized, lawmakers who support such a bill reportedly believe it would increase safety on roadways throughout the state as well as lower insurance costs. The proposed bill is expected to be considered in the Illinois General Assembly soon.

Although some lawmakers allegedly oppose the idea of allowing individuals who are in the country unlawfully to obtain a driver’s license, others have touted the idea as both economically and morally fair. The proposed legislation would expand a current program that allows foreign nationals who are in the United States legally to obtain a temporary vehicle operator’s license. It would require applicants to provide a both a passport and proof of residency in Illinois. Most importantly, such a measure would require drivers to pass a written, road, and vision test and obtain liability insurance. Still, the driver’s licenses issued would not be allowed to serve as a valid form of identification for illegal aliens.

Despite that similar measures have failed twice in the past, Governor Quinn stated he would sign the proposed bill if it is passed. According to Governor Quinn, the proposal is primarily a consumer safety measure. Across the United States, unlicensed motorists are reportedly five times more likely to be involved in a fatal collision than motorists who possess an operator’s license. The Illinois Highway Safety Coalition claims uninsured and unlicensed motorists are involved in almost 80,000 automobile crashes throughout the state every year. In addition, those crashes reportedly result in an estimated $660 million in damages, including about $64 million in property damage claims. In 2011, almost 48,000 citations for driving without a valid license were issued in Cook County alone.

According to the Illinois Highway Safety Coalition, the proposed law could save Illinois automobile insurance customers approximately $46 million in annual premiums. If passed, Illinois would be the third state, along with New Mexico and Washington, to allow illegal immigrants to obtain a temporary driver’s license.

In Chicago, many of us spend a lot of time in our cars. With countless people on the roadways, collisions are bound to occur. A number of factors such as driver inexperience, inattention, or impairment can result in a tragic or fatal automobile accident. Although unlicensed drivers are prohibited from operating a vehicle on Illinois roadways, many choose to ignore the law and drive anyway. If you were involved in a crash that was caused by a negligent driver, you may be entitled to recover financial compensation for any damages you incurred as a result. A skilled car accident attorney can help.
Continue reading

Officials in Naperville recently conducted an educational campaign designed to combat distracted driving in city school zones. The campaign enlisted volunteers to watch out for motorists who used handheld mobile phones in school zones and to distribute informational literature reminding drivers that the practice of talking with a handheld telephone while driving in a school zone is prohibited by state law. As part of the campaign, the City of Naperville also placed billboards reminding drivers to hang up their phones near specific area school zones. In addition, the Naperville Police Department reportedly stepped up enforcement of the state law immediately following the driver education effort.

Sergeant Lee Martin of the Naperville Police Department’s traffic unit stated the education and enforcement campaign was designed to keep school children from being hurt by inattentive motorists. Since January 1, 2010, all drivers in Illinois are prohibited from operating a handheld cellular telephone in a school or construction zone. Motorists under the age of 19 may not utilize a mobile phone on any Illinois roadway except in case of emergency. The fines for violating distracted driving laws in Illinois begin at $75 per infraction. Last year, a similar initiative reportedly had a significant impact on the number of motorists using handheld cell phones in Naperville school zones. According to Officer Martin, the program will likely continue next year.

The laws regarding talking on your mobile phone while driving vary widely throughout the Chicago Metro. Although the City of Chicago has completely banned the use of handheld telephones, other municipalities have adopted the less restrictive state law. Regardless of where you are traveling, mobile telephones generally pose an unnecessary distraction to drivers. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), approximately 416,000 people throughout the United States were hurt in car accidents that resulted from distracted driving in 2010 alone. Sadly, more than 3,000 people died during the same year due to the actions of a distracted driver. The NHTSA also stated the risk of a motor vehicle crash is 23 times higher when a driver is sending or reading a text message.
Continue reading

A 32-year-old Steger man died and at least two other people were injured in a rear-end crash on the Dan Ryan Expressway. According to Illinois State Police Sergeant Jose R. De Jesus, a northbound Chrysler Pacifica was hit from behind by a Chevrolet minivan after it stopped in the express lanes near 26th Street. The initial impact allegedly caused the minivan to strike a wall on the roadway and flip. Fire Media Affairs Spokesperson Kevin MacGregor said emergency responders extricated five people from the accident wreckage.

De Jesus stated one of the three passengers in the minivan was transported to Cook County’s Stroger Hospital where he was pronounced dead. Another minivan passenger was reportedly taken to Northwestern Hospital in serious condition. De Jesus said the driver of the Chrysler was also treated for non-life threatening injuries at Stroger Hospital. The northbound express lanes of the roadway were reportedly closed for more than five hours following the incident.

The exact cause of the fatal collision is under investigation by Illinois State Police. Due to the severity of the accident, it is currently unclear who was driving the minivan at the time of the crash. According to a police statement, no charges were filed in connection with the collision.

Rear-end crashes are common in the Chicago Metro. A driver or passenger in a motor vehicle that was hit from behind may suffer back and neck injuries, severe head trauma, a spinal cord injury, broken bones, and other trauma such as whiplash. As was unfortunately the case here, rear-end crashes may also result in serious injury and death. The victim in a Chicago rear-end auto accident may be entitled to recover compensation for lost wages, medical expenses, any disability that resulted from the collision, pain and suffering, and other damages. The close family members of an individual who was killed in such a crash may also be eligible to file a wrongful death case.

Most rear-end collisions are caused by a motorist who was following too closely or simply failed to remain attentive. Unfortunately, automobile insurance companies often work hard to reject the honest personal injury claims of individuals who had the misfortune of being struck from behind by another driver. In the State of Illinois, liability is determined based on modified comparative negligence. This means someone who was hurt in an automobile or other accident must show that the person who caused his or her harm was more to blame for the injury than they were. In addition, a damages award may be reduced based upon the injured party’s percentage of fault. You should contact a skilled personal injury lawyer to discuss your right to recovery in more detail.
Continue reading

Earlier this month, seven teenagers were transported to two area hospitals following an injury accident in Hinsdale. According to local police, a Toyota Sequoia carrying eight minors rolled and hit both a tree and a light pole after making a sudden turn near the intersection of Fourth and Park Streets. Hinsdale Police Department Deputy Chief Mark Wodka stated all but one of the eight teens riding in the vehicle was transported to either Adventist Hinsdale or Good Samaritan hospitals. Wodka said one of the teens allegedly suffered a head injury and four of the other juveniles hurt in the crash suffered from incapacitating injuries.

The cause of the injury accident is currently under investigation by the Hinsdale Police Department. The 16-year-old driver of the Toyota was reportedly charged with failing to appropriately reduce his speed and driving with too many other teens in the vehicle. According to Wodka, investigators are still attempting to piece together the facts and circumstances that led up to the unfortunate crash.

For the first 12 months of driving, Illinois motorists who are under the age of 18 are not allowed to operate a vehicle with more than one passenger under the age of 20 who is not an immediate family member in the car. Prior to obtaining a driver’s license, all teen drivers in the state must complete an approved driver education course. The hours during which a driver under the age of 18 may operate a vehicle on Illinois roadways is also limited. Additionally, minor drivers in the state may not use a cellular telephone with or without a hands-free device while driving except in case of extreme emergency. Texting while driving is always prohibited.

Automobile accidents are the leading cause of injury and death for teenagers in both Illinois and nationwide. In 2009, an estimated 75 percent of teens had a cell phone and 66 percent used their phones to send text messages. The Illinois graduated driver license laws described above are designed to protect young people and others on the roadway from being hurt as a result of distracted driving. Although any number of factors may contribute to distracted driving, talking on mobile phones, emailing, sending text messages, and talking to passengers are common sources of distraction for new drivers.

Anyone who fails to use reasonable care while operating a motor vehicle in Illinois may be guilty of negligence. Someone who was hurt as a result of that negligence may be eligible to receive financial compensation for damages such as medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and disability. Contact a skilled car accident attorney to help you file your personal injury claim.
Continue reading

Personal injury lawyers at Abels and Annes, working with co-counsel, have filed a lawsuit stemming from an auto accident that occurred in Chicago, Illinois.

The plaintiff was injured when the automobile he was driving was hit head-on by a vehicle driven by a negligent driver. Our client was driving eastbound on Grand approaching its intersection with Mulligan in Chicago, Illinois. The defendant was driving westbound on Grand, approaching its intersection with Mulligan.

The other driver signaled his intention to turn left onto southbound Mulligan. Plaintiff was driving straight and had the right-of-way, so he proceeded into the intersection at Mulligan. The defendant failed to yield the right-of-way to our client and turned left, hitting the front of our vehicle with the front passenger’s side of his vehicle.

The fact pattern in this claim is very common. Our office has seen many, many accidents over the years caused by a motorist failing to yield the right-of-way to oncoming traffic while making a left turn.

The force of the impact was so great that it pushed our client’s car off the road and into a parked car.

The Chicago Police Department responded to the scene of the collision. After speaking with both parties, the police determined the collision was the result of the defendant’s failure to yield the right-of-way.

We are alleging the negligent driver failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to stop and/or reduce his speed to avoid a collision, failed to yield the right-of-way, was driving at an excessive rate of speed, and failed to exercise due care for the safety of those in the area, including Plaintiff.

Following the collision, the plaintiff had an immediate onset of neck, back and head pain.

Shortly after the collision, he sought medical treatment from a physician. The plaintiff complained of pain in his back, neck and head as well as pain in his knee. A history was taken and he was examined. Upon exam, he had paraspinal tenderness that was most severe at L4-S1, left knee pain and limited range of motion in his left knee. The doctor diagnosed him with bursitis, contusion, and a knee injury, prescribed him pain medication, and instructed him to follow up as needed.

Due to ongoing and increasing pain, our client sought follow up medical care with another physician. At that time, he continued to complain of neck pain, headaches, and back pain. A history was taken and he was examined, revealing tenderness to palpation over C1-7, T1-12, L1-S1 and bilateral sacroiliac joints, tenderness to palpation over the bilateral trapezius muscles and the occipital region of the head. The doctor noted subluxations throughout his cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine as well as muscle spasms along the spine, severe at the cervical level. His range of motion was limited in his cervical and lumbar spine. The physician ordered x-rays of his cervical and lumbar spine, which revealed a loss of normal cervical lordosis and pelvic and sacral unleveling.

The doctor diagnosed the plaintiff with cervical brachial syndrome, muscle spasm, lumbar facet syndrome, cervical, thoracic and lumbar segmental dysfunction, and sacroiliac dysfunction. He ordered a course of treatment to consist of neuroelectrical muscle stimulation, thermal modalities, and manual therapy to the spine, sacroiliac joints, and soft tissue areas where he experienced pain. Treatment was ordered to reduce his spasms, normalize his muscle tone, decrease his pain, increase his range of motion, normalize joint function and return him to his pre-injury status.

Pursuant to doctors orders, our client began a course of therapy. He engaged in twenty-four (24) sessions over several months, after which time he was discharged.

Due to the collision, our client has incurred thousands of dollars in medical bills. Today, is still having low back pain on a regular basis, some days worse than others. His pain affects the activities of his daily life and restricts him from engaging in some activities as he did prior to the collision.

A lawsuit was filed in Cook County Circuit Court due to the fact that the defendant’s insurance carrier failed to make a reasonable settlement offer out of court.

Continue reading

Injury attorneys at Abels & Annes have resolved a case for an Illinois resident. This claim arises out of an automobile collision which took place on August 30, 2010 at approximately 5:00 p.m.

Our client was driving southbound on Cumberland, approaching Bryn Mawr in Chicago, Illinois. The defendant was driving northbound on Cumberland approaching Bryn Mawr. The intersection of Cumberland and Bryn Mawr is controlled by a four-way stop light. The plaintiff had a green light at Bryn Mawr so she entered the intersection and continued driving southbound.

The at fault driver intended to make a left turn from Cumberland onto westbound Bryn Mawr. The defendant failed to yield the right-of-way to our client and entered the intersection when it was not safe to do so. He turned into her path and hit the front end of her vehicle with the front passenger side of her own. The force of the impact jolted the plaintiff forward and back violently in her seat.

The Chicago Police Department responded to the scene of the collision and determined the defendant was at fault. The negligent driver received a citation for failure to yield the right-of-way at an intersection while turning left.

We alleged to the defendant’s insurance carrier that their insured failed to keep a proper lookout, was driving at an excessive rate of speed, failed to yield the right-of-way at an intersection before making a left hand turn, and failed to exercise due care for the safety of those in the area, including the Plaintiff. Based upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the occurrence at issue, it was clear that the sole proximate cause of the collision was the negligent conduct of their insured.

Following the incident the plaintiff had an onset of back, neck and abdominal pain. She was 31 weeks pregnant at the time of the collision.

She was taken from the scene of the occurrence by ambulance to Resurrection Medical Center‘s Emergency Department. A history was taken, she was examined and diagnostic tests were performed. She complained of abdominal pain and pressure and was concerned about her pregnancy. She also had pain in her back that radiated down into her left leg. She was discharged and instructed to follow up with a physician as needed.

Due to ongoing and increasing pain, she followed up with a doctor on September 1, 2010. She complained of headaches, pain, stiffness, and numbness in her neck, radiating numbness to both shoulders, severe lower back pain radiating to both legs, and left leg pain. A history was taken and she was examined. She had severe tenderness and muscle spasms on palpation over her cervical spine and thoracic spine muscles, tenderness in both shoulders and severe tenderness in her lumbar spine. She also had limited range of motion in her cervical and lumbar spine. Diagnosed her with musculoligamentous injuries of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine as well as sciatic and contusion of the head. Due to her pregnancy, a course of physical therapy was recommended and she was instructed to follow up for more treatment.

Our client returned to her physican on September 24, 2010. At that time, she continued to complain of headaches, neck numbness and stiffness, severe lower back pain that radiated into both legs, and radiating numbness in her shoulders. Her injuries were so significant that she was having trouble concentrating and sleeping. The doctor again examined her and maintained a diagnosis of musculoligamentous injuries of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine as well as head contusion. As she was 34 weeks pregnant, he instructed her to stop physical therapy for the time being and to resume physical therapy after she delivered her baby.

The plaintiff next treated on December 1, 2010, where she continued to complain of severe pain in her low back that radiated into her left leg. On exam, she had severe tenderness and limited range of motion in her lumbar spine. She was with musculoligamentous lumbosacral spine strain and instructed her to return to physical therapy.

She returned to physical therapy for a period of time.

The claim settled for the defendant’s insurance policy limits of $25,000.
Continue reading

A Chicago car accident lawyer at Abels & Annes is currently representing a local woman who was injured in an October 27, 2011 crash. The plaintiff was hurt when the Toyota Corolla she was driving was rear-ended by Ford Fusion driven by the defendant.

Our client was driving eastbound on I-90 in Chicago, Illinois, near Sayre. Traffic began to slow down and she brought her vehicle to a stop behind another car.

The defendant was also driving eastbound on I-90, behind the Toyota. He failed to slow down for traffic and rear-ended her. The force of the collision caused the plaintiff to hit her chest on the steering wheel.

The Illinois State Police Department responded to the scene of the collision. After speaking with both parties, the responding officer determined the defendant was at fault for causing the collision. The responding officer issued the defendant a citation for driving too fast for conditions/failure to reduce speed to avoid a collision. The officer also determined that he was following the plaintiff too closely and that he had a lack of driving skills, experience and/or knowledge that contributed to the collision.

We are arguing to the defendant’s insurance carrier that their insured failed to keep a proper lookout, drove too fast for conditions, failed to reduce his speed to avoid a collision, followed too closely, and failed to exercise due care for the safety of those in the area, and that based upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the occurrence at issue, it is clear that the sole proximate cause of the collision was the negligent conduct the insured.

Following the collision, the client had an immediate onset of neck pain, back pain, and right arm pain. She was transported from the scene of the occurrence by ambulance to the Resurrection Hospital Emergency Department. At the ER, a history was taken and she was examined. She complained of neck pain and back pain and underwent x-rays of her cervical spine which showed a straightening of the normal cervical lordosis. She was prescribed pain medication and muscle relaxants and instructed to seek follow up care.

Due to ongoing and increasing pain, the plaintiff sought follow up treatment from a medical doctor on October 29, 2011. At that time, she complained of neck pain, back pain, right arm pain, chest pain, and constant headaches. The pain was affecting her sleep and was worse with prolonged sitting or movement. Her physician took a history and examined her. She had tenderness to palpation over C1-7, T1-12, and L1-S1. She had tenderness to both sacroiliac joints, upper trapezius muscles and bilateral gluteals. The doctor noticed muscle spasms in her cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spines as well as multiple trigger points.

Continue reading

Contact Information